Even if you live by yourself, you do not live alone. In a recent analysis of dust samples collected from 1,200 homes across the United States, researchers report that most of us co-habitate with a few thousand species of bacteria and about 2,000 species of fungi.
But don’t reach for the scrub brush and disinfectant just yet.
“I don’t want any readers to be paranoid about this,” said Noah Fierer, a microbial ecologist at the University of Colorado, Boulder. “Most of the organisms are completely innocuous, and some may be beneficial.”
In a paper published this week in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Fierer and his colleagues report that these microscopic communities can also reveal telling details about the people they live with.
It turns out that the specific composition of a home’s bacteria community changes depending on whether there is a dog or cat in the household, as well as the ratio of men to women in the home. The composition of the fungi community, on the other hand, can suggest what climate and geographical region a person lives in.
“If you want to change the types of fungi you are exposed to in your home, then it is best to move to a different home (preferably far away),” the authors wrote. “If you want to change your bacterial exposures, then you just have to change who you live with.”
To come to these conclusions, the research team reached out to citizen scientists across the country through a website called Your Wild Life that helps facilitate the study of microbial life. Volunteers were sent a sterile cotton-tipped swab (it looked like a long Q-tip) and asked to swipe it above the door trim of an interior door and an exterior door.
“The reason we had them sample there is because people don’t touch it, and it is not typically cleaned very often,” Fierer said.
Household dust is made up of a hodgepodge of insect parts, pollen, dead human cells, and also things that weren’t once living, such as dry wall powder, carpet fibers and soil particles. There is also a fair amount of airborne bacteria and fungi in there as well.
The double sampling allowed researchers to see if the microbial populations differed between inside and outside.
After dusting for science, participants were also asked to complete a survey that included questions about the age of their house, how many bedrooms it had, whether it had a basement or carpeting, how often the windows were left open and whether insecticides or mold products had been used recently.
“We asked all sorts of questions, but most of them were not very predictive,” Fierer said.
Still, some patterns did emerge.
The researchers found that most of the fungi in our homes originates outside and likely comes into our houses via soil particles or airborne spores. Therefore, people who live in the same geographical area are likely to have the same types of fungi in their homes.
That is not true for bacteria though. The team found a greater discrepancy between the communities of bacteria in and out of the home, with the interior bacteria population being significantly more diverse than the outside population.
The geographic location of the house did not appear to have an influence on the bacteria community, they wrote, but the presence of pets did.
“There was a lot of variability, but the two main things we noticed were whether the person lived with a dog or a cat,” Fierer said.
He added that the team was also able to predict the ratio of women to men in a household based on the bacteria composition, although this effect was more subtle.
Previous studies had suggested that bacterial communities in homes are associated with people and their pets, but nobody had ever looked at such a large and geographically diverse set of samples before.
“This is the first large-scale study that supports what we already know about the microbes in the home environment,” aid Jack Gilbert, a microbiologist with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory. “It gives us more power to understand the effects of different factors on these communities.”
Fierer said the data from this study will be made public online so other researchers can use it. He also added that the research would not have been possible without the help of unpaid citizen scientists.
“Ideally, we would have a team of scientists all trained to sample in the exact same way, but we would never have had the funding to do that,” he said. “We could never have done this research without our army of volunteers.”
© 2015 Los Angeles Times (CA) under contract with NewsEdge. All rights reserved.